The experiments performed by W. JOHANNSEN with pure lines of Phaseolus vulgaris allowed the distinction between genotype and the effects of environmental factors on the genotype that result together in the specific phenotype of an organism. Though variations caused by the environment may lead to differences in the phenotype of a pure line, a selection within such lines stays without effect. These experiments were necessary preconditions for the theoretical and statistical evaluation of allele frequencies in populations.
Variation of seed size in a pure line population of Phaseolus vulgaris (H. de VRIES, 1906)
An important precondition for the attainment of reproducible
results is the use of defined source material. Pure lines are not
always available from the start.
Perfectly independent of the attempts talked about up until now
are the studies of the Dane W. JOHANNSEN who analyzed the variability
of the french bean (a variety of Phaseolus vulgaris). Numerous
pure lines that differ in certain properties like the average seed
weight exist in this obligatorily self-pollinating variety. These
differences are determined genetically and thus an element of the
genotype. But for a number of reasons, like, for example, the
position of the pod at the plant and the resulting differences in the
supply with assimilates and other nutriments, every plant produces
seeds of different weight. The arrangement of the seeds that is
caused by extern factors represents an element of the phenotype that
is achieved by a combination of hereditary and
environmental factors.
JOHANNSEN chose the lightest and the heaviest seeds of the
phenotype-variations of pure lines of several subsequent generations
for cultivation without achieving a change of the average seed
weight. A selection within pure lines is thus without effect (see
table). Based on these findings did JOHANNSEN coin the terms
genotype and
phenotype.
The relation between the seed
weight of the parental generation and the filial generation
in a variety of brown beans. The figures in the table represent the filial numbers of beans of the different weight categories |
||||||||||
weight of the parental beans |
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variations caused by the
environment have also to be taken into account when evaluating
crossings. An example will illustrate this. E. M. EAST (1910) crossed
a variety with long cobs with varieties with short cobs when studying
the inheritance of the cob length of maize. The F1 was
intermediate but not strictly uniform. The F2-generation
displayed far greater variations since the influences of
environmental factors and the occurrence of different genotypes
overlapped. In such cases, it is impossible to identify the single
genotypes directly.
Inheritance of a quantitative character in maize. Cob length of the varieties Tom Thumb (P1), Black Mexican (P2) and the hybrids (according to E. M. EAST, 1910).
|